Overpriced private sellers

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Duncandl

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
1,207
Reaction score
1,341
Location
South OKC
If you are looking for proof that the government can't manage healthcare look at the VA and the Bureau of Indian Affairs health services, I am part of both. I go to neither...
 

MosinMann

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 30, 2017
Messages
141
Reaction score
37
Location
Oklahoma City
Actually, I'm young and healthy. Most my premiums would be going to fund the healthcare of the older, less healthy folks. I've probably been to the doctor less than a half dozen times in my life, most of that when I was a kid.

It's kinda like social security. I mean, social security is just a socialized 401k. National health insurance is better for the entire economy.

In the end, you have to subsidize everyone that goes to the emergency room without health insurance anyway. By having a national insurance, not only would you get a better value for your money, but free preventative healthcare will help unclog our emergency rooms.

You couldn't achieve a true free market system while requiring hospitals to treat folks regardless of ability to pay.

I miss you.

Sincerely,
Your original post
 

MacFromOK

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 11, 2016
Messages
13,759
Reaction score
14,758
Location
Southern Oklahoma
Back to the definition of "Assault Weapon" ...

C. 140 § 121 Definitions Used Throughout the Firearms Law

As used in sections 122 to 131P, inclusive, the following words shall, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, have the following meanings:

<snip>

"Assault weapon", shall have the same meaning as a semiautomatic assault weapon as defined in the federal Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. section 921(a)(30), and shall include, but not be limited to, any of the weapons, or copies or duplicates of the weapons, of any caliber, known as:

(i) Avtomat Kalashnikov (AK) (all models);

(ii) Action Arms Israeli Military Industries UZI and Galil;

(iii) Beretta Ar70 (SC-70);

(iv) Colt AR-15;

(v) Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN/LAR and FNC;

(vi) SWD M-10, M-11, M-1 1/9 and M-12;

(vi) Steyr AUG;

(vii) INTRATEC TEC-9, TEC-DC9 and TEC-22; and

(viii) revolving cylinder shotguns, such as, or similar to, the Street Sweeper and Striker 12

provided, however, that the term assault weapon shall not include:

(i) any of the weapons, or replicas or duplicates of such weapons, specified in appendix A to 18 U.S.C. section 922, as such weapons were manufactured on October 1, 1993;

(ii) any weapon that is operated by manual bolt, pump, lever or slide action;

(iii) any weapon that has been rendered permanently inoperable or otherwise rendered permanently unable to be designated a semiautomatic assault weapon;

(iv) any weapon that was manufactured prior to the year 1899;

(v) any weapon that is an antique or relic, theatrical prop or other weapon that is not capable of firing a projectile and which is not intended for use as a functional weapon and cannot be readily modified through a combination of available parts into an operable assault weapon;

(vi) any semiautomatic rifle that cannot accept a detachable magazine that holds more than five rounds of ammunition; or

(vii) any semiautomatic shotgun that cannot hold more than five rounds of ammunition in a fixed or detachable magazine
 

JD8

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
32,901
Reaction score
45,996
Location
Tulsa
Actually, I'm young and healthy. Most my premiums would be going to fund the healthcare of the older, less healthy folks. I've probably been to the doctor less than a half dozen times in my life, most of that when I was a kid.

It's kinda like social security. I mean, social security is just a socialized 401k. National health insurance is better for the entire economy.

In the end, you have to subsidize everyone that goes to the emergency room without health insurance anyway. By having a national insurance, not only would you get a better value for your money, but free preventative healthcare will help unclog our emergency rooms.

You couldn't achieve a true free market system while requiring hospitals to treat folks regardless of ability to pay.

This post is so insanely ignorant in terms of healthcare..... I don't know where to start.

Just some highlights....

- Social security isn't even close to a 401K. If it was, we'd all be living a MUCH better retirement.
- "National Insurance" doesn't create "better value" if you somehow believe this, please research the fraud that's taken place in medicare and they gross amount of inefficiency and incompetency in the VA system.
- Our ERs are "clogged" mainly in areas where illegal immigration is a problem. So much so that they are shutting down. Take from that what you will.
- Where are health care providers informed of a patient's ability to pay?? Namely, it's not like a doctor, nurse, etc providing care has some sort of reference on a patient's ability to pay.
 

caojyn

Sharpshooter
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
8,186
Reaction score
1,496
Location
Edmond
jO6u2Mc.gif
i1285.photobucket.com_albums_a589_caojyn_025ADA55_3EF5_4F1F_B892_6CBB2176A398_zpslbi9sn7c.gif
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom