"colossal crash"

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

trekrok

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Mar 6, 2009
Messages
3,648
Reaction score
6,057
Location
Yukon, OK
This is a stupid question I'm sure, but is there no kind of device nowadays that would disable a vehicle's electronics and thus immobilize it? I'm thinking something like a tazer for a car that would fry enough stuff to kill it. Dumb?
 

Cowcatcher

Unarmed boating accident survivor
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 22, 2017
Messages
6,171
Reaction score
13,853
Location
Inola
At the academy they teach to NOT shoot at a moving vehicle. Their stated reasoning is that if you do, you risk hitting someone else with your bullets (not good) and if you did hit the vehicle or driver you have just created an uncontrollable two thousand pound battering ram. (worse)

I’ve been a member of four different departments and they all had policies against shooting at moving vehicles. The only times I’ve ever seen LE Fire at a moving was the former Canadian County Sheriff with a shotgun on I-40 and the more recent pursuit when the OHP Trooper was shooting through his own windshield during the chase with the murder suspect. Both of those were on the news.

There was another incident involving Spencer PD where OCPD chased a suspect from NE 63rd southbound on Midwest Blvd. Two SPD officers had set up a roadblock just north of the bridge and the driver attempted to run over one of the officers. The other officer shot the suspect in the head with an AR15 thinking that the suspect had run over his fellow officer. The suspect vehicle ended up in the river. When they did the recovery the suspect had two bullet holes in his head about an inch apart. I’m sure there are more out there.
I didn’t mean to suggest the officers should have been shooting in this case. They could’ve done a much better job of keeping him blocked in in this situation. Shooting would’ve definitely been a bad idea with the subjects vehicle being surrounded.
 

dennishoddy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
84,829
Reaction score
62,554
Location
Ponca City Ok
I think that is only for GM vehicles, but I could be wrong.

That is true. Although my F-250 is capable of being started, stopped, doors locked or unlocked via the internet. It tells me the tire pressure, cabin temp and a host of other data via an app over the internet.
I wouldn’t be surprised that LEO doesn’t have that capability.
I have all of that turned off on our truck.
 

Fyrtwuck

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
9,970
Reaction score
2,928
Location
Blanchard
And there was a possibility that the suspect in this case was unarmed. The police avoided a cataclysm.

No one knows for sure till someone sees one and even then it could be a toy or airsoft.

This is a stupid question I'm sure, but is there no kind of device nowadays that would disable a vehicle's electronics and thus immobilize it? I'm thinking something like a tazer for a car that would fry enough stuff to kill it. Dumb?

I’ve seen some demonstrated on shows like Modern Marvels, but I don’t think they ever made it past the experimental stages. They were designed to be mounted on the front of the police cars and shoot from the grill guard but you had to get close enough to the fleeing vehicle for it to strike, penetrate the metal and activate.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom