donePerhaps you should modify that statement to "some of you guys" ...
The majority do NOT seem to be defending the shooter.
I think there are very limited circumstances where defense of property is due to said property being required for sustaining life. If I lived in the arctic and someone was trying to steal say, a generator? I'd be inclined to defend said property with lethal force if necessary. If I was in the middle of the desert with no comms and someone tried to steal my transportation? Same thing.
I'm not using lethal force to defend a flag, pot, liquor, etc., because it's not moral, ethical or legal. I will defend my life if I tell said thief that they may not take my property, and they then menace my life with potentially lethal force. I do have one other thing that I'll defend with lethal force if necessary, but I won't discuss it here. It's a dark place and only if someone ever goes there will they find out how serious their mistake is.
I try to not look down my nose at anyone, especially if I don't know their motivations for doing or saying a thing. That doesn't mean I don't have thoughts on the matter, I just figure said thoughts don't really add any value to the discussion, so I keep them to myself.
Yes ... more information is needed.
Law states that if you are committing a felony, any self-defense/stand-your-ground law is off the table. That does not matter what color someone is or even identifies as.
The guy “jostled” the door handle of an illegal grow operation. He got dead for that.
This will get plead down.
Law states that if you are committing a felony, any self-defense/stand-your-ground law is off the table. That does not matter what color someone is or even identifies as.
The guy “jostled” the door handle of an illegal grow operation. He got dead for that.
This will get plead down.
I’ve read several of these threads and the first conclusion I have is the the media stirs up a LOT of controversy which could possibly affect the outcome of any charges and trial. What do they call that? Tried by public opinion?
We all know that the media slants things in the direction that will draw the most attention to their channel.
My question is about the video footage. They mentioned that there was video footage of the night before, but I didn’t see any mention of the night of the incident. Was there any?
We all know that the media slants things in the direction that will draw the most attention to their channel.
My question is about the video footage. They mentioned that there was video footage of the night before, but I didn’t see any mention of the night of the incident. Was there any?
Dude was growing pot. Big freaking deal - that's the equivalent of your machine shop not updating a business license. It's still his property.
Dude should not have shot through the door, period. That was a no-no, both in the eyes of the law and in my own mind.
My guess is there is much more to this than the press is reporting.
Dude should not have shot through the door, period. That was a no-no, both in the eyes of the law and in my own mind.
My guess is there is much more to this than the press is reporting.
No, it's the equivalent of a machine shop making illegal machineguns at 1 am
And some homeless guy jigglied the door knob and got shot.
For years. I was also checking for locked doors. I about shot the Maytag man one night. Full sized motorized cardboard M-effer jumped out at me one night as I was passing the window to an appliance store.
Nothing.
The whole case is about an illegal drug producer killing spmeone
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
Oklahoma City 240rd 30-06 M2 HXP Spam Cans-Final Price Drop- Latest: Moparman485
-
-
-
Want To Buy Pre Lock Vintage or Older S&W Smith and Wesson Revolver- Latest: sushi & pistols
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-