Search Results

No, it merely means that I do not have to agree with you to respect your opinion. I feel that you are being a teenage girl trying to start at fight. By the way, what you are doing is an ad homonym, even if you do not have the intelligence enough to understand your argument(I do).

No, it was a sincere commit.

Free speech on this forum or against each other is not a Right. By the way, I am an expert at Rights. Nice debate, I do not hold anything against anyone that feels a need to defend their belief, even if we disagree.

The family and I stayed at an Embassy Suites in Chicago 2 year ago, over July 4th. There was a family reunion happening at the HOtel, at the same time. the first set of breast my grandson ever got see, live, was one of the girls at the family reunion.

Go back and read your post. Once you understand the Ad hominem, which is what I am doing right now, I will discuss your argument with you. The fact that we disagree is not a "Right."

I would agree, most LEOs are awesome people. I am thankful everyday that we have people in our society that are willing to be the direct object of distaste, and risk their life at the say time. The guy was following the Law, which is responsible, the police department had the responsibility to...

Do you understand what an Ad hominem is?

I think I did exactly that when I voted, but I am no man's slave,

drawing a firearm against a law abiding citizen is aggressive, extremely aggressive. You seem to want to have the government be your daddy and defend your inabilities by insulting me. I do not have a need to argue, I just do not agree with being a slave.

Do the police define your Rights or does the Citizen?

grow up, man!

as soon as they showed up, they should have said "Hi" he should have handed over his SDA Card, they should have said thank you and walked way. Drawing a firearm on him and harassing him after they established he was within his Rights, violates the SDA law.

I do not understand your post. The guy was not violating the law, the police actually were violating his Rights.

Why would I need to tell the strong arm of the executive branch what I am doing, if it is my Right. I am sorry, but the police are not my daddy.

you know you said not to follow you around and insult you. Since you have done that, you have sent me insulting PM's and post directly after me responding to my post. Why dont you grow up and figure out why I do not like you as a man. Try leaving me alone.

It does not really matter because his AR was a pistol by state and/or federal law. The point of the problem is the LEOs, as most, were ignorant of the actual law. His barrel was less than 16" and he had a brace on it. Our local, and respected lawyer on here, actually had a discussion about his...

If you say so!

Let me break it down for you, your argument has nothing to do with the original post. Therefore, everything you are saying is pointless.

I agree, I would like to add that the more people that know folks are bearing arms makes everyone safer. People who argue that they want the tactical advantage are really just scared individuals.

what did he get arrested for?