Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
100 years down the drain
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MoBoost" data-source="post: 1565913" data-attributes="member: 3455"><p>Speaking of .22:</p><p>222rem was enlarged by 8% to make .223 - it gained 300fps and 30 yards of point blank range by just using 2 (7.5%) more grains of powder.</p><p>22-250 on the other hand - gains another 300fps and another 30 yards of point blank range but uses 50% more powder over 223; inefficiency anyone?</p><p></p><p>As far as ".22 Eargesplitten Loudenboomer" - did they ever figure out how to break 5k? Plutonium projectile in front of "not-gunpowder"?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MoBoost, post: 1565913, member: 3455"] Speaking of .22: 222rem was enlarged by 8% to make .223 - it gained 300fps and 30 yards of point blank range by just using 2 (7.5%) more grains of powder. 22-250 on the other hand - gains another 300fps and another 30 yards of point blank range but uses 50% more powder over 223; inefficiency anyone? As far as ".22 Eargesplitten Loudenboomer" - did they ever figure out how to break 5k? Plutonium projectile in front of "not-gunpowder"? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
100 years down the drain
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
