Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
1911 Pistols: Colt v Springfield Armory
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="1Mudman" data-source="post: 3848359" data-attributes="member: 51234"><p>Well Said! Im upgrading a 1911C and also turning a G 34 into a race gun. The 1911's are a engineering marvel and its so great to take something like this and turn it into a masterpiece and there is nothing that matches the natural feel that a 1911. The Glock on the other hand is pretty much polymer and stamped steel with a Stainless Barrel (polygonal bbl) that you cant shoot lead bullets with and steel pins. To tighten up a Glock you have to peen the slide and compound it out. Then install a gunsmith fit bbl, not a drop in! A 1911 you have many options and end up with beautiful buttery slide to frame that feels like is floating at perfection. To get a 3.5 (or less) trigger pull on a 1911 is pretty effortless and has a (breaks like glass) trigger pull with easily adjustable pre-travel and over travel. The Glock on the other hand gets into a incredibly dangerous situation with stamped steel sear engagement teetering on a stamped steel connector that has the engagement angle altered at the verge that a slight bump would allow the sear to drop, just to get a marginal trigger at 3.5 lbs that still has some creep and overtravel. If you adjust it out with the modifications or spend several hundred for a adjustable trigger, then you have gone out of the liability and warranty of the Glock that I would be afraid to holster! The two guns both have a value in our world and I have owned several of each (well maybe a lot more 1911's) because they are just a better gun. Glocks rebuilds are kind of like putting lipstick on a pig! But if they are actually left stock out of the box you have a gun that you can put a lot of rounds through and it still goes bang. Just my two cents worth of many years of sending lead down range.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="1Mudman, post: 3848359, member: 51234"] Well Said! Im upgrading a 1911C and also turning a G 34 into a race gun. The 1911's are a engineering marvel and its so great to take something like this and turn it into a masterpiece and there is nothing that matches the natural feel that a 1911. The Glock on the other hand is pretty much polymer and stamped steel with a Stainless Barrel (polygonal bbl) that you cant shoot lead bullets with and steel pins. To tighten up a Glock you have to peen the slide and compound it out. Then install a gunsmith fit bbl, not a drop in! A 1911 you have many options and end up with beautiful buttery slide to frame that feels like is floating at perfection. To get a 3.5 (or less) trigger pull on a 1911 is pretty effortless and has a (breaks like glass) trigger pull with easily adjustable pre-travel and over travel. The Glock on the other hand gets into a incredibly dangerous situation with stamped steel sear engagement teetering on a stamped steel connector that has the engagement angle altered at the verge that a slight bump would allow the sear to drop, just to get a marginal trigger at 3.5 lbs that still has some creep and overtravel. If you adjust it out with the modifications or spend several hundred for a adjustable trigger, then you have gone out of the liability and warranty of the Glock that I would be afraid to holster! The two guns both have a value in our world and I have owned several of each (well maybe a lot more 1911's) because they are just a better gun. Glocks rebuilds are kind of like putting lipstick on a pig! But if they are actually left stock out of the box you have a gun that you can put a lot of rounds through and it still goes bang. Just my two cents worth of many years of sending lead down range. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
1911 Pistols: Colt v Springfield Armory
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom