Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
1911 Pistols: Colt v Springfield Armory
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="diggler1833" data-source="post: 3866021" data-attributes="member: 48072"><p>Both companies have figured out their MIM parts game pretty well, better than 'MIMber' (Kimber) and Taurus at least. I rarely read about their internals suffering from breakages...and that says a lot with all the pistols both manufacturers have out there. </p><p></p><p>Both companies have an assembly process that puts out 1911s that are put together well enough to shoot better than 98% of the guys and gals using them too, while still maintaining a decent degree of reliability...usually. </p><p></p><p>You pay a lot for the Colt name, but you almost always get that back at resale. The higher-end 1911s out of Colt's and Springfield's custom shops have become collectable as long as they are shot little and well taken care of. I'd probably give the nod to Colt though on "investment grade" pistols. </p><p></p><p>Personally, I think it comes down to the features you want, and your opinion of the company on which way is the right way for you to purchase.</p><p></p><p>I think that the Colt vs. Springfield is a pretty solid comparison.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="diggler1833, post: 3866021, member: 48072"] Both companies have figured out their MIM parts game pretty well, better than 'MIMber' (Kimber) and Taurus at least. I rarely read about their internals suffering from breakages...and that says a lot with all the pistols both manufacturers have out there. Both companies have an assembly process that puts out 1911s that are put together well enough to shoot better than 98% of the guys and gals using them too, while still maintaining a decent degree of reliability...usually. You pay a lot for the Colt name, but you almost always get that back at resale. The higher-end 1911s out of Colt's and Springfield's custom shops have become collectable as long as they are shot little and well taken care of. I'd probably give the nod to Colt though on "investment grade" pistols. Personally, I think it comes down to the features you want, and your opinion of the company on which way is the right way for you to purchase. I think that the Colt vs. Springfield is a pretty solid comparison. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
1911 Pistols: Colt v Springfield Armory
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom