Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
1911 VS Glock - final showdown! Which one will keep shooting longer?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JD8" data-source="post: 2704567" data-attributes="member: 24"><p>I don't see how anyone could believe ALL the companies out there compare themselves to Glock but that's just me. Now granted it's obvious SOME platforms took some ideas from glock and expanded on them, but Ruger, Sig, Springfield etc are much different and much better gun companies as a whole. Most of the signature platforms of said companies if anything market towards what Glocks obviously lack.... good trigger, ergos, halfway decent sights. So most have evolved quite a bit from anything that people believe could compare to a Glock. On top of that you're seeing little design improvements here or there within the same platforms to keep from having issues that Glock had, like WML issues. </p><p></p><p>I think companies have also looked at Glock and learned how not to progress with recalls, AKA as "upgrades" in Glock terms. You see the big boys tackle new platform issues quite differently as everyone has them, it's just a matter of how companies go about it. Most will willingly admit there's a problem and recall the gun. Glock seems to be a little better about this currently but you had to pull teeth to get them to admit something was wrong with their guns, and quietly they admitted as such with "upgraded" parts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JD8, post: 2704567, member: 24"] I don't see how anyone could believe ALL the companies out there compare themselves to Glock but that's just me. Now granted it's obvious SOME platforms took some ideas from glock and expanded on them, but Ruger, Sig, Springfield etc are much different and much better gun companies as a whole. Most of the signature platforms of said companies if anything market towards what Glocks obviously lack.... good trigger, ergos, halfway decent sights. So most have evolved quite a bit from anything that people believe could compare to a Glock. On top of that you're seeing little design improvements here or there within the same platforms to keep from having issues that Glock had, like WML issues. I think companies have also looked at Glock and learned how not to progress with recalls, AKA as "upgrades" in Glock terms. You see the big boys tackle new platform issues quite differently as everyone has them, it's just a matter of how companies go about it. Most will willingly admit there's a problem and recall the gun. Glock seems to be a little better about this currently but you had to pull teeth to get them to admit something was wrong with their guns, and quietly they admitted as such with "upgraded" parts. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
1911 VS Glock - final showdown! Which one will keep shooting longer?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom