Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
1st Congressional District Residents: WARNING!!!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 3247025" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>It could literally be anything the Task Force decides (with the approval of the DHS Secretary).</p><p></p><p>The Task Force shall be composed of not more than 24 members as follows:</p><p></p><p>(i) The Secretary or a designee with a position classified at GS–15 or above.</p><p>(ii) Not more than 2 representatives of a <strong>nongovernmental organization</strong> that is determined by the Secretary to have expertise in behavioral threat assessment and management.</p><p>(iii) Not more than 2 mental health service professionals with clinical experience who are determined by the Secretary to have expertise in behavioral threat assessment and management.</p><p>(iv) <strong>One State or local prosecutor</strong> who is determined by the Secretary to have expertise in behavioral threat assessment and management.</p><p>(v) Not more than <strong>2 representatives from an educational entity</strong> who are determined by the Secretary to have expertise in behavioral threat assessment and management.</p><p>(vi) Not more than 2 representatives from local behavioral threat assessment and management units who are determined by the Secretary to have expertise in behavioral threat assessment and management.</p><p>(vii) Not more than 2 representatives from State behavioral threat assessment and management units who are determined by the Secretary to have expertise in behavioral threat assessment and management.</p><p>(viii) <strong>One expert in behavioral threat assessment and management appointed by the head of each of the following entities:</strong></p><p>(I) The National Threat Assessment Center of the <strong>United States Secret Service</strong>.</p><p>(II) The Protective Intelligence and Assessment Division of the United States Secret Service.</p><p>(III) The Behavioral Analysis Unit–1 of the Critical Incident Response Group of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.</p><p>(IV) The <strong>Joint Terrorism Task Force of the Federal Bureau of Investigation</strong>.</p><p>(V) The Office of Protective Intelligence of the United States Marshals Service of the Department of Justice.</p><p>(VI) The Office on Violence Against Women of the Department of Justice.</p><p>(VII) The <strong>Naval Criminal Investigative Service</strong> of the Department of the Navy.</p><p>(VIII) The Threat Assessment Section of the United States Capitol Police.</p><p>(IX) The<strong> Department of Education</strong>.</p><p>(X) The <strong>Department of Health and Human Services</strong>.</p><p>(XI) The Department of <strong>Veterans Affairs</strong>.</p><p>(XII) The Office of Protective Intelligence Investigations of the Diplomatic Security Service of the <strong>Department of State</strong>.</p><p></p><p>So we know that the U.S. government has abused the Patriot Act, illegally spied on American Citizens, conspired with private sector service providers to track American Citizens without a warrant or probable cause, weaponized the DoJ against the 2nd Amendment, weaponized the IRS against conservative groups, conspired to deny DoD service members their rights and Due Process, etc., etc., etc., ad nauseum.</p><p></p><p>Do we trust them now to set up some Star Chamber and not have it abused to the detriment of American Citizens at some point in the future? How about the SPLC, NYC/NYS prosecutor, anti-gun "experts" from Johns Hopkins or UC Irvine sitting in judgement of American citizens? I certainly don't! <img src="/images/smilies/image057.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":nolike:" title="Image057 :nolike:" data-shortname=":nolike:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 3247025, member: 1132"] It could literally be anything the Task Force decides (with the approval of the DHS Secretary). The Task Force shall be composed of not more than 24 members as follows: (i) The Secretary or a designee with a position classified at GS–15 or above. (ii) Not more than 2 representatives of a [B]nongovernmental organization[/B] that is determined by the Secretary to have expertise in behavioral threat assessment and management. (iii) Not more than 2 mental health service professionals with clinical experience who are determined by the Secretary to have expertise in behavioral threat assessment and management. (iv) [B]One State or local prosecutor[/B] who is determined by the Secretary to have expertise in behavioral threat assessment and management. (v) Not more than [B]2 representatives from an educational entity[/B] who are determined by the Secretary to have expertise in behavioral threat assessment and management. (vi) Not more than 2 representatives from local behavioral threat assessment and management units who are determined by the Secretary to have expertise in behavioral threat assessment and management. (vii) Not more than 2 representatives from State behavioral threat assessment and management units who are determined by the Secretary to have expertise in behavioral threat assessment and management. (viii) [B]One expert in behavioral threat assessment and management appointed by the head of each of the following entities:[/B] (I) The National Threat Assessment Center of the [B]United States Secret Service[/B]. (II) The Protective Intelligence and Assessment Division of the United States Secret Service. (III) The Behavioral Analysis Unit–1 of the Critical Incident Response Group of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. (IV) The [B]Joint Terrorism Task Force of the Federal Bureau of Investigation[/B]. (V) The Office of Protective Intelligence of the United States Marshals Service of the Department of Justice. (VI) The Office on Violence Against Women of the Department of Justice. (VII) The [B]Naval Criminal Investigative Service[/B] of the Department of the Navy. (VIII) The Threat Assessment Section of the United States Capitol Police. (IX) The[B] Department of Education[/B]. (X) The [B]Department of Health and Human Services[/B]. (XI) The Department of [B]Veterans Affairs[/B]. (XII) The Office of Protective Intelligence Investigations of the Diplomatic Security Service of the [B]Department of State[/B]. So we know that the U.S. government has abused the Patriot Act, illegally spied on American Citizens, conspired with private sector service providers to track American Citizens without a warrant or probable cause, weaponized the DoJ against the 2nd Amendment, weaponized the IRS against conservative groups, conspired to deny DoD service members their rights and Due Process, etc., etc., etc., ad nauseum. Do we trust them now to set up some Star Chamber and not have it abused to the detriment of American Citizens at some point in the future? How about the SPLC, NYC/NYS prosecutor, anti-gun "experts" from Johns Hopkins or UC Irvine sitting in judgement of American citizens? I certainly don't! :nolike: [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
1st Congressional District Residents: WARNING!!!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
