Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="chuter" data-source="post: 2135129" data-attributes="member: 13693">SB173; no liability for property/business owners that do or do not allow firearms to be carried: seems like this could cut both ways.It might make it easier for some to decide to allow firearms, but it also hurts the argument that if they refuse to allow firearms in the business then the business is responsible for customers not being able to defend themselves.I don't know if anyone has actually sued a business for that before.............?Wasn't there a bill that clarified that simply posting a no-guns sign did not mean crossing the threshold was tresspassing?  You had to be asked to leave first?</blockquote>