Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
2nd Amendment Belongs Only in History Books Alongside Extinct Militias?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Freedom@AnyCost" data-source="post: 2196231" data-attributes="member: 29628"><p>I think you might be missing the point of of the essay as a whole by focusing on only one aspect of the theme. This essay is about logic thinking.</p><p></p><p>Logic is consistent. A logical person is consistent in how the apply logic. A logical person looks at the available facts and either does or does not make a decision on an issue based on the existence of verifiable facts. However, even a logical person can be duped when everyone around them, including the boob tube, from the time we are young, tells us something is true. </p><p></p><p>The essay pointed out three common logical fallacies where most people hold two of three to be true but not the third. The hope of the author was to get people to do a little introspection and maybe some research. When we recognize the faults in our own thinking and address them, we are much better equipped to make compelling arguments to others. When we apply logic equally on all issues and not just along party lines, that too makes our words much more compelling to our audience.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Freedom@AnyCost, post: 2196231, member: 29628"] I think you might be missing the point of of the essay as a whole by focusing on only one aspect of the theme. This essay is about logic thinking. Logic is consistent. A logical person is consistent in how the apply logic. A logical person looks at the available facts and either does or does not make a decision on an issue based on the existence of verifiable facts. However, even a logical person can be duped when everyone around them, including the boob tube, from the time we are young, tells us something is true. The essay pointed out three common logical fallacies where most people hold two of three to be true but not the third. The hope of the author was to get people to do a little introspection and maybe some research. When we recognize the faults in our own thinking and address them, we are much better equipped to make compelling arguments to others. When we apply logic equally on all issues and not just along party lines, that too makes our words much more compelling to our audience. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
2nd Amendment Belongs Only in History Books Alongside Extinct Militias?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom