Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
350 Legend bullet testing
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Moparman485" data-source="post: 3781345" data-attributes="member: 38840"><p>Right. The main hiccups I’ve heard about with regard to the 350L have to do with the chamber in the portion where the bullet would sit pre-firing. Two of my prior ARs had no issues chambering .357s, but my Ruger and 3 other ARs would not chamber without excessive force or bullet setback. But they ran .355 diameter (and plated .356) just fine. Would’ve been much simpler if they had made it to run .357 from the outset.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Moparman485, post: 3781345, member: 38840"] Right. The main hiccups I’ve heard about with regard to the 350L have to do with the chamber in the portion where the bullet would sit pre-firing. Two of my prior ARs had no issues chambering .357s, but my Ruger and 3 other ARs would not chamber without excessive force or bullet setback. But they ran .355 diameter (and plated .356) just fine. Would’ve been much simpler if they had made it to run .357 from the outset. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
350 Legend bullet testing
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom