Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Firearm Training
5 Clues that Training is Not Realistic
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael Brown" data-source="post: 83915" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>?ux|hicane]I understand your veiw of kydex being "easily broken" during a grapple-style encounter... But are you also saying that a adjustable tension kydex holster is easier to be dis-armed than a Milt Sparks?</p><p></p><p>I carry a Kytac IWB and I can adjust it much tighter than the VMII that I had before. I promise it is easier to get a glock 30 out of a VM2 than out of the Kytac.</p><p></p><p>Have you tried to break a C-tac or Kytac IWB holster? The ones with the flexiable leather connecting the holster to the clips? If so were you able to break them as easily as the fobus? In your opinion would they hold up to a linemen grabbing on them?</p></blockquote><p></p><p>I think kydex IWB is just fine. The CTAC is a great carry holster.</p><p></p><p>My dislike of kydex is generally relegated to the OWB variety which is chosen because the user has a pre-conceived notion that speed out of the holster is the primary virtue of a concealed carry pieice. This is where the gun games like IDPA/IPSC have done a tremendous disservice to those interested in self-protection. Timing, not time, is the primary consideration in close quarters.</p><p></p><p>Yes, we have broken a CTAC before but that does not change my opinion that it still does what is required of a good holster and if I wore a kydex holster, it would be my first choice.</p><p></p><p>Michael Brown</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Michael Brown, post: 83915, member: 18"] ?ux|hicane]I understand your veiw of kydex being "easily broken" during a grapple-style encounter... But are you also saying that a adjustable tension kydex holster is easier to be dis-armed than a Milt Sparks? I carry a Kytac IWB and I can adjust it much tighter than the VMII that I had before. I promise it is easier to get a glock 30 out of a VM2 than out of the Kytac. Have you tried to break a C-tac or Kytac IWB holster? The ones with the flexiable leather connecting the holster to the clips? If so were you able to break them as easily as the fobus? In your opinion would they hold up to a linemen grabbing on them?[/QUOTE] I think kydex IWB is just fine. The CTAC is a great carry holster. My dislike of kydex is generally relegated to the OWB variety which is chosen because the user has a pre-conceived notion that speed out of the holster is the primary virtue of a concealed carry pieice. This is where the gun games like IDPA/IPSC have done a tremendous disservice to those interested in self-protection. Timing, not time, is the primary consideration in close quarters. Yes, we have broken a CTAC before but that does not change my opinion that it still does what is required of a good holster and if I wore a kydex holster, it would be my first choice. Michael Brown [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Firearm Training
5 Clues that Training is Not Realistic
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom