Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
92x performance
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rammulek" data-source="post: 4166833" data-attributes="member: 54797"><p>Hey everyone,</p><p>So I edc my 92x performance model sometimes and I had a confrontation from someone the other day about it being holstered with one in the chamber, the hammer back and the thumb safety on. He said the 92x is unsafe when the hammer is back regardless if the safety is on due to it not having the extra grip safety like the 1911's. Is he correct or should I ignore him and continue carrying the way I do?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rammulek, post: 4166833, member: 54797"] Hey everyone, So I edc my 92x performance model sometimes and I had a confrontation from someone the other day about it being holstered with one in the chamber, the hammer back and the thumb safety on. He said the 92x is unsafe when the hammer is back regardless if the safety is on due to it not having the extra grip safety like the 1911's. Is he correct or should I ignore him and continue carrying the way I do? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
92x performance
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom