Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
A call to hands (and mouths): Remember your oath
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JB Books" data-source="post: 2095168" data-attributes="member: 6889"><p>It's THEIR business. The have the right to decide how to run it. If they choose to prohibit guns, you are free to patronize other businesses. You are free to organize a boycott of their business. However, you have to remember, it's still THEIR business.</p><p></p><p>The obligations of private enterprise to recognize your rights are very narrow. Their desire to do so is even more narrow. Their goal is profit, pure and simple.</p><p></p><p>What I'm having trouble with is your contention that you have a "right" you can somehow force upon someone, particularly when this "right" isn't among those that could qualify as "protected." It seems in your zeal to exercise your rights, you would deny others theirs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JB Books, post: 2095168, member: 6889"] It's THEIR business. The have the right to decide how to run it. If they choose to prohibit guns, you are free to patronize other businesses. You are free to organize a boycott of their business. However, you have to remember, it's still THEIR business. The obligations of private enterprise to recognize your rights are very narrow. Their desire to do so is even more narrow. Their goal is profit, pure and simple. What I'm having trouble with is your contention that you have a "right" you can somehow force upon someone, particularly when this "right" isn't among those that could qualify as "protected." It seems in your zeal to exercise your rights, you would deny others theirs. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
A call to hands (and mouths): Remember your oath
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
