Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
A completely reasonable way to deal with the new wave of open carry morons.....
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vicious" data-source="post: 1878526" data-attributes="member: 3937"><p>I believe that in his course of investigation he was doing the right thing. We all have choices to make, whether a public servant or the public at large, and sometimes it's more prudent to err on the side of caution. Can you say for sure that there were no identifying marks that led the officer to believe that it could have been fully automatic? My eyes aren't that good, but I'd say it's possible. </p><p></p><p>As others have said, he was looking for confrontation, and that's what he found. Now, if he was being singled out over and over again by the same police I'd have to say it was harassment, but that's something he can take up with the department or courts. Personally, I'd have simply complied, and addressed it later if I felt raw about it.</p><p></p><p>Starting Nov. 1 I will open carry more often than concealed, and I have faith that the police and population at large will have very little interest with the glock on my hip. I'm not out looking for trouble, or trying to look tacti-cool. I'm simply being prepared if something does happen.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vicious, post: 1878526, member: 3937"] I believe that in his course of investigation he was doing the right thing. We all have choices to make, whether a public servant or the public at large, and sometimes it's more prudent to err on the side of caution. Can you say for sure that there were no identifying marks that led the officer to believe that it could have been fully automatic? My eyes aren't that good, but I'd say it's possible. As others have said, he was looking for confrontation, and that's what he found. Now, if he was being singled out over and over again by the same police I'd have to say it was harassment, but that's something he can take up with the department or courts. Personally, I'd have simply complied, and addressed it later if I felt raw about it. Starting Nov. 1 I will open carry more often than concealed, and I have faith that the police and population at large will have very little interest with the glock on my hip. I'm not out looking for trouble, or trying to look tacti-cool. I'm simply being prepared if something does happen. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
A completely reasonable way to deal with the new wave of open carry morons.....
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom