I've tried to sell stuff at a fair price lately, but I was thinking. If I bought a bunch of gold in 2003 for $390 an ounce, it would be foolish to sell it in 2013 for $390 an ounce, when it's worth $1700 an ounce. What I paid for it is irrelevant. Why is this same principle not accepted in the selling of ARs, lowers and mags? You can't justifiably judge the shrewd gold buyer for making a 400% profit, so why do we judge the shrewd gun collector who foresaw this coming and stocked up on these items? It just seems like hypocrisy. Just my 2 cents.