Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
A question for all Members of OSA
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 2021555" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>I wholeheartedly disagree with you. We've got 5 pages of people on board with the idea and willing to help, but you offer nothing constructive in the way of support. What sort of volunteer services to you provide to your community? </p><p></p><p>Things are only impossible when nattering naybobs of negativity like you convince people they are. You cannot say that local school boards will never allow it. You can say your <u>opinion</u> is such, but you do not speak for the school boards. You do not speak for the legislators and you do not speak for us. You speak for yourself alone. Now that we've dispensed with your negativity, let's move on to something meaningful.</p><p></p><p>The GFSZA was designed to prohibit <u>individuals</u> from entering a school zone with a gun in an unauthorized manner. It does not prohibit carry of a gun in a school zone 100%</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Pay careful attention to the sections I've bolded. These are the sections that allow schools to hire armed security and police to patrol the schools. The language is not exclusive to armed guards or LEO's. A school can enter into a contract with anyone they wish, so long as it complies with any applicable local and state laws as well. </p><p></p><p>You could commission a school employee as a LEO with a very narrow and restrictive jurisdiction and police powers. The precedent is already in wide use and acceptance on the federal level. Just research the Federal Flight Deck Officer program. They are fully commissioned and empowered federal law enforcement officers, with a tiny jurisdiction and restrictive rules of engagement (cockpit only). You could contract school employees to provide armed security, but each employee would have to be CLEET licensed and bonded as an armed security officer. </p><p></p><p>Remember guys, nothing is impossible if you set your mind to it. I support the concept here, but I have to tell you that it has to be presented perfectly and it needs to be highly structured and narrow in scope. Otherwise the odds of success are significantly lower. I'd implore you to ignore what YJ is saying and press forward on all fronts, not just those someone tells you are the only way. </p><p></p><p>Semper Fi! <img src="/images/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 2021555, member: 1132"] I wholeheartedly disagree with you. We've got 5 pages of people on board with the idea and willing to help, but you offer nothing constructive in the way of support. What sort of volunteer services to you provide to your community? Things are only impossible when nattering naybobs of negativity like you convince people they are. You cannot say that local school boards will never allow it. You can say your [U]opinion[/U] is such, but you do not speak for the school boards. You do not speak for the legislators and you do not speak for us. You speak for yourself alone. Now that we've dispensed with your negativity, let's move on to something meaningful. The GFSZA was designed to prohibit [U]individuals[/U] from entering a school zone with a gun in an unauthorized manner. It does not prohibit carry of a gun in a school zone 100% Pay careful attention to the sections I've bolded. These are the sections that allow schools to hire armed security and police to patrol the schools. The language is not exclusive to armed guards or LEO's. A school can enter into a contract with anyone they wish, so long as it complies with any applicable local and state laws as well. You could commission a school employee as a LEO with a very narrow and restrictive jurisdiction and police powers. The precedent is already in wide use and acceptance on the federal level. Just research the Federal Flight Deck Officer program. They are fully commissioned and empowered federal law enforcement officers, with a tiny jurisdiction and restrictive rules of engagement (cockpit only). You could contract school employees to provide armed security, but each employee would have to be CLEET licensed and bonded as an armed security officer. Remember guys, nothing is impossible if you set your mind to it. I support the concept here, but I have to tell you that it has to be presented perfectly and it needs to be highly structured and narrow in scope. Otherwise the odds of success are significantly lower. I'd implore you to ignore what YJ is saying and press forward on all fronts, not just those someone tells you are the only way. Semper Fi! :) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
A question for all Members of OSA
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
