Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Acorn falls on hood = shoot at handcuffed suspect
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KurtM" data-source="post: 4221352" data-attributes="member: 6064"><p>Well, destruction of city property comes right to mind of a charge. Wreckless endangerment comes bubbling up, culpable mental state or not, but I digress. I agree on one thing, his department and training let him down. Over the last 25 years that I have been involved in training L.E. I have noticed a very disturbing trend of fear based training which has become wide spread in almost all aspects of training. Older training was more like be wary and make sure you see hands to now a days, treat every interaction as if they intend to kill you. Get the wrong guy, scared of his own shadow, any loud noise and wah lah, you get a guy shooting across his partner seated in the car to shoot the complainant at the window of the car because you "thought" you heard a loud noise (Minnesota), or this fine stalwart who is so sure he was being fired upon he shot up his own car and fell to the ground "wounded". By merely saying you can't understand because you've never done the job at some level implies that he is less at fault, or at least should be treated with less harshness, and at that point we can agree to disagree.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KurtM, post: 4221352, member: 6064"] Well, destruction of city property comes right to mind of a charge. Wreckless endangerment comes bubbling up, culpable mental state or not, but I digress. I agree on one thing, his department and training let him down. Over the last 25 years that I have been involved in training L.E. I have noticed a very disturbing trend of fear based training which has become wide spread in almost all aspects of training. Older training was more like be wary and make sure you see hands to now a days, treat every interaction as if they intend to kill you. Get the wrong guy, scared of his own shadow, any loud noise and wah lah, you get a guy shooting across his partner seated in the car to shoot the complainant at the window of the car because you "thought" you heard a loud noise (Minnesota), or this fine stalwart who is so sure he was being fired upon he shot up his own car and fell to the ground "wounded". By merely saying you can't understand because you've never done the job at some level implies that he is less at fault, or at least should be treated with less harshness, and at that point we can agree to disagree. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Acorn falls on hood = shoot at handcuffed suspect
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom