Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Poke78" data-source="post: 2304266" data-attributes="member: 4333"><p>I&#039;m plenty cynical -- especially about those who can&#039;t or won&#039;t see simple facts. You have the evidence of two competing viewpoints being printed at the same time, on the same page, and of essentially the same length. Trying to extrapolate that into something it isn&#039;t does not enhance your position. I&#039;ve not generally been a Tulsa World fan, especially under the Lortons. The new ownership has shown signs of better aligning the paper to the community while expanding the opportunity for multiple views to be published and read. If the time comes that what you predict comes about on the TW editorial pages, then we&#039;ll have evidence for which we can rightly condemn their hypocrisy on understanding freedoms and rights. I&#039;ll be right there with you in that condemnation but these columns are as fair and balanced a presentation as could be expected by either side of the question.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Poke78, post: 2304266, member: 4333"] I'm plenty cynical -- especially about those who can't or won't see simple facts. You have the evidence of two competing viewpoints being printed at the same time, on the same page, and of essentially the same length. Trying to extrapolate that into something it isn't does not enhance your position. I've not generally been a Tulsa World fan, especially under the Lortons. The new ownership has shown signs of better aligning the paper to the community while expanding the opportunity for multiple views to be published and read. If the time comes that what you predict comes about on the TW editorial pages, then we'll have evidence for which we can rightly condemn their hypocrisy on understanding freedoms and rights. I'll be right there with you in that condemnation but these columns are as fair and balanced a presentation as could be expected by either side of the question. [/QUOTE]

Verification