Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Action filed against OSBI
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 2269740" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>From <a href="http://www.ok.gov/osbi/documents/SDA_Lawbook_NOV_2012.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.ok.gov/osbi/documents/SDA_Lawbook_NOV_2012.pdf</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Wrong. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So to recap, the OSBI <u>ONLY</u> has 90 calendar days to issue the license if the FBI fingerprint search is delayed or if records pertaining to the applicant are revealed. In all other cases, they actually only have 60 calendar days. So when I send my application in for renewal and I have no records, and I have never had a problem getting print results after submissions that number in the double digits now, and I know that the federal government can process a CHRC and STA (Security Threat Assessment) in five to seven calendar days, then it stands to reason that the OSBI is in violation of state law when they exceed 90 days to issue. Every application packet should be date stamped on the day it arrives, not when they get around to opening it. That was the intent of the law.</p><p></p><p>The reason for their repeated and sustained violations of state law are wholly irrelevant. Either issue or deny. Unreasonable delay is not an option. There's zero justification for it when the applicant fees are absolutely high enough to sustain a compliant operation. When such a flagrant and willful violation of state law by a state agency persists to this level, a class action suit is reasonable to force compliance. In this case, monetary damages should only be for lost time, court costs and attorney's fees. They should be forced to issue a public apology and IMMEDIATELY come into compliance with state law.</p><p></p><p>OSBI's actions on this subject are indefensible. Enough is enough already. <img src="/images/smilies/nono1.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":nono1:" title="Nono1 :nono1:" data-shortname=":nono1:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 2269740, member: 1132"] From [url]http://www.ok.gov/osbi/documents/SDA_Lawbook_NOV_2012.pdf[/url] Wrong. So to recap, the OSBI [U]ONLY[/U] has 90 calendar days to issue the license if the FBI fingerprint search is delayed or if records pertaining to the applicant are revealed. In all other cases, they actually only have 60 calendar days. So when I send my application in for renewal and I have no records, and I have never had a problem getting print results after submissions that number in the double digits now, and I know that the federal government can process a CHRC and STA (Security Threat Assessment) in five to seven calendar days, then it stands to reason that the OSBI is in violation of state law when they exceed 90 days to issue. Every application packet should be date stamped on the day it arrives, not when they get around to opening it. That was the intent of the law. The reason for their repeated and sustained violations of state law are wholly irrelevant. Either issue or deny. Unreasonable delay is not an option. There's zero justification for it when the applicant fees are absolutely high enough to sustain a compliant operation. When such a flagrant and willful violation of state law by a state agency persists to this level, a class action suit is reasonable to force compliance. In this case, monetary damages should only be for lost time, court costs and attorney's fees. They should be forced to issue a public apology and IMMEDIATELY come into compliance with state law. OSBI's actions on this subject are indefensible. Enough is enough already. :nono1: [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Action filed against OSBI
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom