Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Active shooter, San Beradino, CA - Breaking News Wed 2 Dec
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tRidiot" data-source="post: 2820293" data-attributes="member: 9374"><p>Good question....</p><p></p><p></p><p>Anyone else find it odd they haven't come out and harped on the KIND of weapons used in this attack? I mean, that's one of the first things they do in these cases, the mainstream media and President, that is. Pointing out that they used "assault weapons" and military-style weaponry, doing all they can to point to these kinds of weapons being used in mass attacks. Does anyone have any info on what specific weapons were used in this attack? I mean, I've heard people mentioning ARs and AKs, but haven't seen any official statements about it. 5.56 ammo was used, I believe, so I'm assuming ARs, but can't figure out why the media isn't harping on it as usual? Maybe because they were illegal in Cali, yet the perpetrators had no problems in obtaining them - maybe because this just goes to show how useless such bans are? I don't know, I'm just spitballing here.</p><p></p><p>Anyone got specifics that are legit and not just talking-head mumbo-jumbo assumptions and uneducated jargon?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tRidiot, post: 2820293, member: 9374"] Good question.... Anyone else find it odd they haven't come out and harped on the KIND of weapons used in this attack? I mean, that's one of the first things they do in these cases, the mainstream media and President, that is. Pointing out that they used "assault weapons" and military-style weaponry, doing all they can to point to these kinds of weapons being used in mass attacks. Does anyone have any info on what specific weapons were used in this attack? I mean, I've heard people mentioning ARs and AKs, but haven't seen any official statements about it. 5.56 ammo was used, I believe, so I'm assuming ARs, but can't figure out why the media isn't harping on it as usual? Maybe because they were illegal in Cali, yet the perpetrators had no problems in obtaining them - maybe because this just goes to show how useless such bans are? I don't know, I'm just spitballing here. Anyone got specifics that are legit and not just talking-head mumbo-jumbo assumptions and uneducated jargon? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Active shooter, San Beradino, CA - Breaking News Wed 2 Dec
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom