Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Akins Accelerator infringement
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorjj" data-source="post: 1437226" data-attributes="member: 7292"><p>Akins sounds like a douche. Obviously he got screwed but the the way he defended himself repeating himself over and over with those long posts was so tiresome. I thought of a couple of things as I was reading that thread. First off, his patent states that that action has to cycle forward and backward a predetermined distance. Well, what if you designed a stock that let it travel a non predetermined distance? Patent infringement averted. Second off, he kept saying that if similar designs or thoughts had been in the public domain that he would have never been issued a patent. Well, I don't know if they were or not but the patent office issues patents every single day that should be invalid for that exact reason. At this point it's moot, but had it been allowed and taken off as a business, I guarantee there would have been enough evidence of public domain to invalidate his patent. Now nobody even cares. I mean, why would anyone spend $20,000 trying to invalidate a patent for a product you can't market?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorjj, post: 1437226, member: 7292"] Akins sounds like a douche. Obviously he got screwed but the the way he defended himself repeating himself over and over with those long posts was so tiresome. I thought of a couple of things as I was reading that thread. First off, his patent states that that action has to cycle forward and backward a predetermined distance. Well, what if you designed a stock that let it travel a non predetermined distance? Patent infringement averted. Second off, he kept saying that if similar designs or thoughts had been in the public domain that he would have never been issued a patent. Well, I don't know if they were or not but the patent office issues patents every single day that should be invalid for that exact reason. At this point it's moot, but had it been allowed and taken off as a business, I guarantee there would have been enough evidence of public domain to invalidate his patent. Now nobody even cares. I mean, why would anyone spend $20,000 trying to invalidate a patent for a product you can't market? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Akins Accelerator infringement
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom