Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Almost two years ago I came to this forum seeking advice in drafting a "No Firearms"
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Murph" data-source="post: 2048804" data-attributes="member: 8602"><p>You might point out that people who take the trouble to get a carry permit are among the most trustworthy in the country in two areas. <strong>Permit holders</strong> are champs at recognizing when defensive use is called for to preserve life as well as when such use is inappropriate. They are also extremely competent at avoiding collateral damage. We can confidently make these assertions by pointing out that while the population of permit holders now numbers in the millions, news reports on permit holders 'errors of judgement' and/or 'lack of skill' are so low as to be basically non-existent. For additional support you could point out the significance that this lack of coverage occurs in a media environment that is biased towards keeping any negative 'stories' about firearms in the national news cycle as much as possible while limiting or even ignoring reports of defensive gun use .</p><p></p><p>IANAL but ignoring the recognizable benefits associated with the presence of permit holders might render the bank liable for any damages suffered by employees or customers during a robbery or other life threatening event.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Murph, post: 2048804, member: 8602"] You might point out that people who take the trouble to get a carry permit are among the most trustworthy in the country in two areas. [B]Permit holders[/B] are champs at recognizing when defensive use is called for to preserve life as well as when such use is inappropriate. They are also extremely competent at avoiding collateral damage. We can confidently make these assertions by pointing out that while the population of permit holders now numbers in the millions, news reports on permit holders 'errors of judgement' and/or 'lack of skill' are so low as to be basically non-existent. For additional support you could point out the significance that this lack of coverage occurs in a media environment that is biased towards keeping any negative 'stories' about firearms in the national news cycle as much as possible while limiting or even ignoring reports of defensive gun use . IANAL but ignoring the recognizable benefits associated with the presence of permit holders might render the bank liable for any damages suffered by employees or customers during a robbery or other life threatening event. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Almost two years ago I came to this forum seeking advice in drafting a "No Firearms"
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom