Amazon

[El Pablo]

If you have some insight you can share without being hung for some breach, that could be enlightening for us here.

Woody

Why, would you be an admin or security expert making at least 1/2 what you could working in the private sector? The skill level and expertise was just not there.

 

[CHenry]

Big-Tech Collusion..... someone needs to launch a congressional investigation.....That's probably on the list right after the Republicans impeach Harris for inciting riots.

Bet your ass that will happen or be attempted.

 

[SoonerP226]

bad enough that Microsoft has the contract.

The only three companies capable of handling a project of this type and scope are Microsoft, Google, and Amazon. Google's employees were dead set against it. When some of Microsoft's employees tried to voice the same concerns, Microsoft's management replied in no uncertain terms that not only was it good business to work with the DoD, it was also their duty to their country.

So why, again, is it a bad thing that Microsoft has the contract?

 

[Rez Exelon]

The only three companies capable of handling a project of this type and scope are Microsoft, Google, and Amazon. Google's employees were dead set against it. When some of Microsoft's employees tried to voice the same concerns, Microsoft's management replied in no uncertain terms that not only was it good business to work with the DoD, it was also their duty to their country.

So why, again, is it a bad thing that Microsoft has the contract?

It's really all just part of the plan. The DoD contract is just a cover for them spinning up the server farm that they'll link to the nanochips in the Rona vaccine to track us.

(That's me being a smarty butt for the slow people btw)

 

[dennishoddy]

Big-Tech Collusion..... someone needs to launch a congressional investigation.....That's probably on the list right after the Republicans impeach Harris for inciting riots.

Great catch. She absolutely did.

 

[dennishoddy]

But twitter has and does go on big isis/isil bans, etc. https://fortune.com/2018/04/05/twitter-terrorist-account-suspensions/

Some of it is our optics are a bit skewed, we ALL (left, right, center, male, female, old, young...) suffer from confirmation bias, anchor bias, truthiness, straw man arguments, ad hominen and multiple other biases and logical fallacies. I try to confront mine, and know I fail at times. I don't expect anyone to agree with my opinions. I change them often based on new information. It's a big reason why I ask for examples all the time. It is so I can try to evaluate them independently and attempt to evaluate my own biases and logical fallacies.

Again, twitter went on a large ban of the left in 2018 during the occupy wall street protests, as I've posted more than once. No one I've followed has ever been banned. So the rest, I have to go research.

It would be nice if people could at least agree on the truth, there is only one, and disagree on our opinions. But, that seems to be more impossible with each passing day.

You have your opinion, but why is the death to America still on the tweeter? Hell, both my sons are currently in FB jail for simple Trump video's and my wife was warned tonight after posting some Trump pics. She was called a terrorist and a danger to the country in her post by other FB members that needed to be banned should they not? Warned for a picture of Trump in an SUV? Those that called her a terrorist did not get banned for violating "community standards"?
I get the private company, their rules, comments and believe in that 100% if they only carried the same "community standards" across the board which they have not and do not.
Personally that's why I don't partake of any of those BS SOCIALIST media sites. I have a membership in all of them so that I can access some of the links folks post here on OSA but I do not actively use them.
At least on OSA the "community standards" are enforced across the board fairly.

 

[Pstmstr]

I wonder why Twitter didn’t censor this or put a disclaimer on it? Seems like those claiming the Democrats on social media are censored equally should have an answer.

https://twitter.com/speakerpelosi/status/864522009048494080?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[Blue Heeler]

Not trying to pick on you because that would be mean to do to someone like you. And again, you are either trying to sound smarter than you really are OR you really don't think about what you write. For instance ...

If OSA censors dirty language, we're censoring speech. Are YOU okay with that? If so, why?

There are different types of censorship. The reason for different types of censorship is because there are different REASONS or OBJECTIVES for censoring.

For instance, the censorship on this forum is to facilitate civil discourse. They are not censoring speech to limit speech. They are just trying to prevent people from being "Richard Noggins" which can send forums such as this south. On the flip side, the objective of the censorship from leftist social media platforms is to silence opposing thought much like what the fascist regimes need to do to maintain control.

Do you see a difference now? Light go on? Might try to read you post before hitting “Post Reply” so you might ... wait for it ... censor yourself from saying something stupid (again)?

Lastly ... thank you for graphically illustrating that there is such a thing as a "stupid question".

 

[Blue Heeler]

You have your opinion, but why is the death to America still on the tweeter? Hell, both my sons are currently in FB jail for simple Trump video's and my wife was warned tonight after posting some Trump pics. She was called a terrorist and a danger to the country in her post by other FB members that needed to be banned should they not? Warned for a picture of Trump in an SUV? Those that called her a terrorist did not get banned for violating "community standards"?
I get the private company, their rules, comments and believe in that 100% if they only carried the same "community standards" across the board which they have not and do not.
Personally that's why I don't partake of any of those BS SOCIALIST media sites. I have a membership in all of them so that I can access some of the links folks post here on OSA but I do not actively use them.
At least on OSA the "community standards" are enforced across the board fairly.

FB restricted my account for posting a gif of Harris blowing the "J" on a Joe Biden sign. Then a 30 day for violating their "community standards" for "sexual activity or nudity" for the picture below. Yeah ... their censors must live or did some time in a Turkish prison. Got another 30 day for simply explaining to some anti-gun loons that the gun bans in Australia and New Zealand have not worked as advertised in their "liberal coloring books". When they told me I must be "smoking something strong" and was "delusional", I suggested they take a bump of Midol and try to do some honest research. That they said was "bullying".

 

[CHenry]

Not trying to pick on you because that would be mean to do to someone like you. And again, you are either trying to sound smarter than you really are OR you really don't think about what you write. For instance ...



There are different types of censorship. The reason for different types of censorship is because there are different REASONS or OBJECTIVES for censoring.

For instance, the censorship on this forum is to facilitate civil discourse. They are not censoring speech to limit speech. They are just trying to prevent people from being "Richard Noggins" which can send forums such as this south. On the flip side, the objective of the censorship from leftist social media platforms is to silence opposing thought much like what the fascist regimes need to do to maintain control.

Do you see a difference now? Light go on? Might try to read you post before hitting “Post Reply” so you might ... wait for it ... censor yourself from saying something stupid (again)?

Lastly ... thank you for graphically illustrating that there is such a thing as a "stupid question".

Lol, go easy on the lad
Bless his heart after all.