Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Amazon
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rez Exelon" data-source="post: 3497093" data-attributes="member: 5800"><p>Oh, so we should seize the means of communication huh? Socialize it into the public domain? Make sure that Big Daddy Government protects our rights against evil private companies? Or what are you trying to say here? Either private companies and persons can conduct their business freely or they can't. Just because you don't like it doesn't means that it's not Constitutional. </p><p></p><p>Is there anyone saying you can't speak to the public? No. But you have to do it according to the terms of that private company. Trump for instance seems to think he's been muzzled. Oddly though, he hasn't seemed to give press conferences, video addresses, radio addresses, or any other types of addresses to us recently. So the one person that has a built in way of communicating either has nothing to say or wants to be a petulant child because he can't have it his way when a private company, who can do as they wish under current law, banned him.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rez Exelon, post: 3497093, member: 5800"] Oh, so we should seize the means of communication huh? Socialize it into the public domain? Make sure that Big Daddy Government protects our rights against evil private companies? Or what are you trying to say here? Either private companies and persons can conduct their business freely or they can't. Just because you don't like it doesn't means that it's not Constitutional. Is there anyone saying you can't speak to the public? No. But you have to do it according to the terms of that private company. Trump for instance seems to think he's been muzzled. Oddly though, he hasn't seemed to give press conferences, video addresses, radio addresses, or any other types of addresses to us recently. So the one person that has a built in way of communicating either has nothing to say or wants to be a petulant child because he can't have it his way when a private company, who can do as they wish under current law, banned him. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Amazon
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom