Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Amazon
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blue Heeler" data-source="post: 3498775" data-attributes="member: 46613"><p>OMG! I might be "shamed" for talking down to you?!? I ... I don't know how I would be able to cope with such a heavy stone upon my shoulders. </p><p></p><p>You are wrong (still). I am not and have not argued that censorship is not censorship or to your other non sequitur examples that infringement is not infringement. BUT there are different reasons/objectives for censoring speech. </p><p></p><p>Should one be allowed to falsely claim “FIRE” in a crowded theatre, or should they be censored and not allowed to do such? </p><p></p><p>With that, you don’t get the intent for censorship. The objective of the mods to (gasp) censor posts is to support civil discourse. The intent for the left to censor the right is to limit thought to only their political convenience.</p><p></p><p>To argue as you have that we live in a dichotomous world where "it is or isn't", is puerile at best. It’s censorship or not censorship. It’s infringement or it is not infringement. Apples are not oranges, genius.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blue Heeler, post: 3498775, member: 46613"] OMG! I might be "shamed" for talking down to you?!? I ... I don't know how I would be able to cope with such a heavy stone upon my shoulders. You are wrong (still). I am not and have not argued that censorship is not censorship or to your other non sequitur examples that infringement is not infringement. BUT there are different reasons/objectives for censoring speech. Should one be allowed to falsely claim “FIRE” in a crowded theatre, or should they be censored and not allowed to do such? With that, you don’t get the intent for censorship. The objective of the mods to (gasp) censor posts is to support civil discourse. The intent for the left to censor the right is to limit thought to only their political convenience. To argue as you have that we live in a dichotomous world where "it is or isn't", is puerile at best. It’s censorship or not censorship. It’s infringement or it is not infringement. Apples are not oranges, genius. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Amazon
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom