Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Amazon
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blue Heeler" data-source="post: 3498810" data-attributes="member: 46613"><p>You are not bright enough to understand but you made my point. It's not that censorship is censorship as you continually try to frame this argument to be BUT that there is a reason for such. </p><p></p><p>You stated ...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And I answered that there are reasons (like not yelling “FIRE!” in a crowded theatre) for such. The mods here do such to maintain civil discourse. On the flip side, there is censorship for political convenience that only the left, the CCP, DPRK and a handful of living Nazis think is OK.</p><p></p><p>Then you went off on your non sequitur bender on “infringement is infringement” to reframe this argument to what it is not. Try to focus. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Are you wearing a ball gag which prohibits your from moving your lips to read? Don’t even want to speculate how in the wide world of sports you came up with that one. Has nothing to do with “acceptability”. Go back and reread my comments ... and take the ball gag out.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sounds like you need a tissue and a hug.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blue Heeler, post: 3498810, member: 46613"] You are not bright enough to understand but you made my point. It's not that censorship is censorship as you continually try to frame this argument to be BUT that there is a reason for such. You stated ... And I answered that there are reasons (like not yelling “FIRE!” in a crowded theatre) for such. The mods here do such to maintain civil discourse. On the flip side, there is censorship for political convenience that only the left, the CCP, DPRK and a handful of living Nazis think is OK. Then you went off on your non sequitur bender on “infringement is infringement” to reframe this argument to what it is not. Try to focus. Are you wearing a ball gag which prohibits your from moving your lips to read? Don’t even want to speculate how in the wide world of sports you came up with that one. Has nothing to do with “acceptability”. Go back and reread my comments ... and take the ball gag out. Sounds like you need a tissue and a hug. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Amazon
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom