Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="criticalbass" data-source="post: 1347720" data-attributes="member: 711">Not sure which part you disagree with.&nbsp; I&#039;ll try to outline main points and maybe we can determine where we differ. *Dems were able to accomplish almost nothing because of Repub stonewalling.*We need a bipartisan approach to government.*Dems know after Tuesday that most Americans think they want less gov&#039;t.*Opportunity now exists for a few non-disastrous changes*With Repub control of the house, stonewalling is an image Repubs can no longer afford.I did not use the word &quot;compromise,&quot; and did not intend to suggest that it should be anyone&#039;s policy.&nbsp; However &quot;my way or else&quot; isn&#039;t a good place to be either.So, if you wouldn&#039;t mind, which of the points do you disagree with, and what do you think needs to happen now that the House has changed majorities?&nbsp;&nbsp; CB</blockquote>

[QUOTE="criticalbass, post: 1347720, member: 711"] Not sure which part you disagree with. I'll try to outline main points and maybe we can determine where we differ. *Dems were able to accomplish almost nothing because of Repub stonewalling. *We need a bipartisan approach to government. *Dems know after Tuesday that most Americans think they want less gov't. *Opportunity now exists for a few non-disastrous changes *With Repub control of the house, stonewalling is an image Repubs can no longer afford. I did not use the word "compromise," and did not intend to suggest that it should be anyone's policy. However "my way or else" isn't a good place to be either. So, if you wouldn't mind, which of the points do you disagree with, and what do you think needs to happen now that the House has changed majorities? CB [/QUOTE]

Verification