Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 2015700" data-attributes="member: 1132">I&#039;ll speculate. I&#039;ll speculate that the mall was a falsely posted &quot;gun free zone&quot;. Care to bet on it? <img src="/images/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" data-shortname=":)" />Yes, it does sound defeatist. I wouldn&#039;t budge an inch on this one. Do you see abortion supporters budging when fetuses are killed? Not an inch. There&#039;s no logical reason to. Every last argument the antis rely on is an emotional one that&#039;s not grounded in logic. If they can&#039;t be reasonable and logical in a debate, there&#039;s no reason to budge. Even many anti-gun legislators admitted that gun control is a non-starter after Aurora. In 35 years, McDonald v. Chicago and D.C. v. Heller will be settled case law just as Roe v. Wade is today. The only way that will not happen is if we incrementally give up ground the way we did starting in 1968 with the GCA. That was a proven failure on our part and it shouldn&#039;t be repeated.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 2015700, member: 1132"] I'll speculate. I'll speculate that the mall was a falsely posted "gun free zone". Care to bet on it? :) Yes, it does sound defeatist. I wouldn't budge an inch on this one. Do you see abortion supporters budging when fetuses are killed? Not an inch. There's no logical reason to. Every last argument the antis rely on is an emotional one that's not grounded in logic. If they can't be reasonable and logical in a debate, there's no reason to budge. Even many anti-gun legislators admitted that gun control is a non-starter after Aurora. In 35 years, McDonald v. Chicago and D.C. v. Heller will be settled case law just as Roe v. Wade is today. The only way that will not happen is if we incrementally give up ground the way we did starting in 1968 with the GCA. That was a proven failure on our part and it shouldn't be repeated. [/QUOTE]

Verification