Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Another P320 firing by itself incident. Injured police officer.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mtngunr" data-source="post: 4356444" data-attributes="member: 46104"><p>Do you have links showing that? It matches exactly what I said as for large contract gun runs having possibly some defect that others lacked past happenstance overrun going elsewhere.</p><p></p><p>Well, I was hoping you could provide more info past telling me to go and check packaging on parts unavailable around here, and vague reference to other second hand info on the Sig forum same as posted here....</p><p></p><p>As a matter of fact, I went to the Sig forum and this India thing is old news, that firm also makes turbine blades, the Sig forum rather tired of the discussion, and past the old news drop-safe failures in very limited circumstances, not much hard info there, either.</p><p></p><p>That being said, I again repeat my distaste of Glockish voluntary recalls, where Glock surely dodged a needed recall, and Sig's actions giving even the appearance of doing the same has me not wanting to run out and buy one, causes me to suspect the worst on the newer gun, same as their extractors breaking on compact nines had me not wanting to keep mine and it was sold, and I have no plans to buy a gun from them again. Newer ain't always better among most every maker, and often times is worse.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mtngunr, post: 4356444, member: 46104"] Do you have links showing that? It matches exactly what I said as for large contract gun runs having possibly some defect that others lacked past happenstance overrun going elsewhere. Well, I was hoping you could provide more info past telling me to go and check packaging on parts unavailable around here, and vague reference to other second hand info on the Sig forum same as posted here.... As a matter of fact, I went to the Sig forum and this India thing is old news, that firm also makes turbine blades, the Sig forum rather tired of the discussion, and past the old news drop-safe failures in very limited circumstances, not much hard info there, either. That being said, I again repeat my distaste of Glockish voluntary recalls, where Glock surely dodged a needed recall, and Sig's actions giving even the appearance of doing the same has me not wanting to run out and buy one, causes me to suspect the worst on the newer gun, same as their extractors breaking on compact nines had me not wanting to keep mine and it was sold, and I have no plans to buy a gun from them again. Newer ain't always better among most every maker, and often times is worse. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Another P320 firing by itself incident. Injured police officer.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom