Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 1942944" data-attributes="member: 13624">You should avoid AirOne at all costs.&nbsp; The owner, Hal Harris, had his ticket revoked by the FAA for giving flight instruction without actually being an instructor.&nbsp; I&#039;m having trouble finding the initial ruling, but I did find the order denying his appeal, which notes the reason for his revocation: &quot;The Administrator’s emergency order revoked respondent’s airman certificate (with airline transport pilot and commercial pilot privileges) for his alleged unauthorized endorsements of the logbooks of two airmen in violation of FAR sections 61.3(d)(2)(iii) and 61.59(a)(2).&quot;<a href="http://www.ntsb.gov/alj/o_n_o/docs/AVIATION/5110.PDF" target="_blank">http://www.ntsb.gov/alj/o_n_o/docs/AVIATION/5110.PDF</a>I shall refrain from repeating the various airport gossip (at least some of which I know to be true), but this is hard fact, backed by legal orders.&nbsp; I recommend steering well clear.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 1942944, member: 13624"] You should avoid AirOne at all costs. The owner, Hal Harris, had his ticket revoked by the FAA for giving flight instruction without actually being an instructor. I'm having trouble finding the initial ruling, but I did find the order denying his appeal, which notes the reason for his revocation: "The Administrator’s emergency order revoked respondent’s airman certificate (with airline transport pilot and commercial pilot privileges) for his alleged unauthorized endorsements of the logbooks of two airmen in violation of FAR sections 61.3(d)(2)(iii) and 61.59(a)(2)." [url]http://www.ntsb.gov/alj/o_n_o/docs/AVIATION/5110.PDF[/url] I shall refrain from repeating the various airport gossip (at least some of which I know to be true), but this is hard fact, backed by legal orders. I recommend steering well clear. [/QUOTE]

Verification