Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chuckie" data-source="post: 4052184" data-attributes="member: 42584">- You know as well as I do that several manufacturers of weapon accessories had marketed &#039;arm-braces&#039; that were capable of being shoulder-braced which is NOT what the legitimate arm-brace was supposed to be used for. You also know as well as I that the ATF granted (if I can use that word) an exemption to legitimately handicapped individuals for the requirement to register SBR&#039;s that were to be used with the arm-brace - all designed to allow paraplegics to safely shoot their rifles or shotguns (both of which had to have shorter barrels for lightness) with just one arm.- You also know as well as I that SOME non-handicapped individuals purchased [shoulder braced] &#039;arm-braces&#039; to use with their own SBR&#039;s &amp; SBS&#039;s, then illegally claimed the exemption granted to the legitimately handicapped in order to get around having to register their own SBR&#039;s&amp;SBS&#039;s.- You also know that the ATF re-worded their &#039;exemption&#039; rulings as well as their definition of &quot;arm-brace&quot; on several occasions to try and address the illegalities that were going on. Of course, as always, it degenerated into nothing more than a blame game with the guilty parties blaming the ATF, blaming the DOJ, blaming the government, blaming the President . . . blaming everyone but those trying to cheat the system.- You knew exactly what was going on - so don&#039;t insult my intelligence with your feigned ignorance and bull-ship talk [USER=24]@JD8[/USER].</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chuckie, post: 4052184, member: 42584"] - You know as well as I do that several manufacturers of weapon accessories had marketed 'arm-braces' that were capable of being shoulder-braced which is NOT what the legitimate [B]arm[/B]-brace was supposed to be used for. You also know as well as I that the ATF granted (if I can use that word) an exemption to legitimately handicapped individuals for the requirement to register SBR's that were to be used with the arm-brace - all designed to allow paraplegics to safely shoot their rifles or shotguns (both of which had to have shorter barrels for lightness) with just one arm. - You also know as well as I that SOME non-handicapped individuals purchased [shoulder braced] 'arm-braces' to use with their own SBR's & SBS's, then illegally claimed the exemption granted to the legitimately handicapped in order to get around having to register their own SBR's&SBS's. - You also know that the ATF re-worded their 'exemption' rulings as well as their definition of "arm-brace" on several occasions to try and address the illegalities that were going on. Of course, as always, it degenerated into nothing more than a blame game with the guilty parties blaming the ATF, blaming the DOJ, blaming the government, blaming the President . . . blaming everyone but those trying to cheat the system. - You knew exactly what was going on - so don't insult my intelligence with your feigned ignorance and bull-ship talk [I][USER=24]@JD8[/USER].[/I] [/QUOTE]

Verification