Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chuckie" data-source="post: 4053611" data-attributes="member: 42584">I would like to believe that, as with most people on OSA, you actually do understand what&#039;s going on, but I don&#039;t know, maybe you&#039;re just looking to argue about something - but I&#039;ll direct you to my post at #235 instead which explains what it&#039;s all about again, rather than playing your little lets have another &#039;endless debate game&#039;.- The 9-year old letter you posted from the ATF has absolutely nothing to do with what was being talked about.&nbsp; Yes, an SBR is still an SBR regardless of whom is using it.&nbsp; Yes, an arm-brace is still an arm-brace regardless of whom is using one - but that is not what it was about.- It boils down to some SBR owners wanting to be exempted from the tax-stamp and registration requirement (reserved for paraplegics) which they were not entitled to have, then cheating the system with work-a-rounds to get there (i.e. shoulder-braced &#039;arm-braces&#039;).&nbsp; Then, when the ATF said &#039;nope, ain&#039;t gonna happen because . . . &#039;, those same SBR owners started blaming (as usual) the ATF, the DOJ, the .gov, the President, everyone except those that were actually responsible for trying to get something they were not entitled to - themselves.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chuckie, post: 4053611, member: 42584"] I would like to believe that, as with most people on OSA, you actually do understand what's going on, but I don't know, maybe you're just looking to argue about something - but I'll direct you to my post at #235 instead which explains what it's all about again, rather than playing your little lets have another 'endless debate game'. - The 9-year old letter you posted from the ATF has absolutely nothing to do with what was being talked about. Yes, an SBR is still an SBR regardless of whom is using it. Yes, an arm-brace is still an arm-brace regardless of whom is using one - but that is not what it was about. - It boils down to some SBR owners wanting to be exempted from the tax-stamp and registration requirement (reserved for paraplegics) which they were not entitled to have, then cheating the system with work-a-rounds to get there (i.e. shoulder-braced 'arm-braces'). Then, when the ATF said 'nope, ain't gonna happen because . . . ', those same SBR owners started blaming (as usual) the ATF, the DOJ, the .gov, the President, everyone except those that were actually responsible for trying to get something they were not entitled to - themselves. [/QUOTE]

Verification