Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
Anyone register a pistol brace?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JD8" data-source="post: 4061237" data-attributes="member: 24"><p>Seems someone is getting forgetful......let's review......</p><p></p><p><strong><em>"Like most things, the gun community screwed themselves by trying to circumnavigate the laws. I'm not talking about whether a member of the gun community thinks the laws are 'right', whether the ATF has the power to make a law, whether the ATF has the power to enforce it, whether anyone believes that their Constitutional 'Rights' have been violated, whether 'Ginger' or Mary Anne' is the better pick, or any other tangent that people ALWAYS like to shoot off on.</em></strong></p><p><em><strong>What I'm talking about is the arm-brace that was designed for and approved for use by those with a disability, to allow them to be able to shoot a shorter barreled (and lighter) weapon accurately and safely.</strong></em></p><p><em><strong>And just like with the Bump-stock, which was produced and marketed as a work-a-round to existing gun laws that prohibited the possession and use of non-registered 'machine guns', the arm-brace was seen as a way to work-a-round the existing laws that prohibited ownership and use of unregistered SBR's.</strong></em></p><p><em><strong>Now, after a few 'screwed the pooch' and got caught, everyone is up in arms (no pun intended) about having their 'right' to have an unregistered arm-brace violated, which was never their 'right' in the first place. Not only did they screw themselves, they also screwed every disabled shooter that needed that arm-brace in order to safely enjoy the shooting sports.</strong></em></p><p><strong><em>Blame the ATF, blame Congress, blame the sitting President (as usual), </em><span style="font-size: 22px"><em>but the only ones that really deserve the blame are those that tried to circumnavigate the laws by breaking them."</em></span></strong></p><p></p><p></p><p>I mean.... there's a lot of stupidity in this post but Again..... Fudds are gonna Fudd. They're misinformed and especially apologetic to the ATF. As given here. Notice we have Ol'Chuckie apologizing for the ATF by giving I dunno how many strawman arguments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JD8, post: 4061237, member: 24"] Seems someone is getting forgetful......let's review...... [B][I]"Like most things, the gun community screwed themselves by trying to circumnavigate the laws. I'm not talking about whether a member of the gun community thinks the laws are 'right', whether the ATF has the power to make a law, whether the ATF has the power to enforce it, whether anyone believes that their Constitutional 'Rights' have been violated, whether 'Ginger' or Mary Anne' is the better pick, or any other tangent that people ALWAYS like to shoot off on.[/I][/B] [I][B]What I'm talking about is the arm-brace that was designed for and approved for use by those with a disability, to allow them to be able to shoot a shorter barreled (and lighter) weapon accurately and safely. And just like with the Bump-stock, which was produced and marketed as a work-a-round to existing gun laws that prohibited the possession and use of non-registered 'machine guns', the arm-brace was seen as a way to work-a-round the existing laws that prohibited ownership and use of unregistered SBR's. Now, after a few 'screwed the pooch' and got caught, everyone is up in arms (no pun intended) about having their 'right' to have an unregistered arm-brace violated, which was never their 'right' in the first place. Not only did they screw themselves, they also screwed every disabled shooter that needed that arm-brace in order to safely enjoy the shooting sports.[/B][/I] [B][I]Blame the ATF, blame Congress, blame the sitting President (as usual), [/I][SIZE=6][I]but the only ones that really deserve the blame are those that tried to circumnavigate the laws by breaking them."[/I][/SIZE][/B] I mean.... there's a lot of stupidity in this post but Again..... Fudds are gonna Fudd. They're misinformed and especially apologetic to the ATF. As given here. Notice we have Ol'Chuckie apologizing for the ATF by giving I dunno how many strawman arguments. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
Anyone register a pistol brace?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
