Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
are godless kids doomed?...and other fun stuff
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TerryMiller" data-source="post: 2781080" data-attributes="member: 7900"><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">For myself, I go with the American Standard Version of 1901. When I asked if the KJV wasn't the best translation because it was the oldest, I was told that the NIV included things that were learned from the Dead Sea Scrolls, which the KJV obviously didn't have. Then I was told that the ASV of 1901 was the closest translation, word for word. This was confirmed by a conversation with a Biblical scholar who was a professor at Oklahoma Christian University in Edmond. That same person knows the original languages and has even worked with the Dead Sea Scrolls. He told me that he could translate directly from the original languages to the ASV. For any other version, he would then have to paraphrase.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">So, I use the ASV and if I encounter something that is a strange word, I fall back on the New American Standard Version for the paraphrased text to get the gist of what the ASV is saying.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TerryMiller, post: 2781080, member: 7900"] [FONT=Georgia][SIZE=3]For myself, I go with the American Standard Version of 1901. When I asked if the KJV wasn't the best translation because it was the oldest, I was told that the NIV included things that were learned from the Dead Sea Scrolls, which the KJV obviously didn't have. Then I was told that the ASV of 1901 was the closest translation, word for word. This was confirmed by a conversation with a Biblical scholar who was a professor at Oklahoma Christian University in Edmond. That same person knows the original languages and has even worked with the Dead Sea Scrolls. He told me that he could translate directly from the original languages to the ASV. For any other version, he would then have to paraphrase. So, I use the ASV and if I encounter something that is a strange word, I fall back on the New American Standard Version for the paraphrased text to get the gist of what the ASV is saying. [/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
are godless kids doomed?...and other fun stuff
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom