Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
Article stating ATF may be re-thinking the classification of the Sig Brace
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Super Dave" data-source="post: 2681198" data-attributes="member: 8429"><p>Looks like they found a way to cover the base that they missed the first time. </p><p></p><p>Surely they didn't see the popularity of the Sig brace coming after the letter came out stating that you could shoulder it. </p><p></p><p>So if one can still shoulder the Sig brace legally, how is it that another product that is to be manufactured to do MOSTLY the same thing (no point about it being made for handicapped folks) can not? AND I QUOTE "...however, using the brace improperly does not constitute a design change. <strong><u>Using such an accessory would not change the classification of the weapon per Federal law.</u></strong>"</p><p></p><p>The letter does state that Martin's design is made of plastic. Hmmm.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Super Dave, post: 2681198, member: 8429"] Looks like they found a way to cover the base that they missed the first time. Surely they didn't see the popularity of the Sig brace coming after the letter came out stating that you could shoulder it. So if one can still shoulder the Sig brace legally, how is it that another product that is to be manufactured to do MOSTLY the same thing (no point about it being made for handicapped folks) can not? AND I QUOTE "...however, using the brace improperly does not constitute a design change. [B][U]Using such an accessory would not change the classification of the weapon per Federal law.[/U][/B]" The letter does state that Martin's design is made of plastic. Hmmm. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
Article stating ATF may be re-thinking the classification of the Sig Brace
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom