Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Boehlertaught" data-source="post: 2003664" data-attributes="member: 14520"><p>That&#039;s pretty funny!&nbsp; I agree the the OP handled the situation well...&nbsp; But, in four pages of posts no one has mentioned the throwback of what OC can potentially do to all of use because of whom we annoy by OCing.&nbsp; I don&#039;t care if you call it flaunting, following your rights or what ever.&nbsp; All of us have be honest, there&#039;s a bit of &quot;in your face&quot; we all would like to say to all the gun haters.&nbsp; But, once again, who are we annoying in the process.&nbsp; The more abvious we are with our OC the more we are noticed.&nbsp; Outa site outa mind is sometimes a better deal.&nbsp; I don&#039;t want to get the soccer moms trying to protect there childern from a perfectly legal OCer just because she thinks you&#039;re a threat.&nbsp; We could send all the folks that are riding the fence on gun control to the side of total restriction.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Boehlertaught, post: 2003664, member: 14520"] That's pretty funny! I agree the the OP handled the situation well... But, in four pages of posts no one has mentioned the throwback of what OC can potentially do to all of use because of whom we annoy by OCing. I don't care if you call it flaunting, following your rights or what ever. All of us have be honest, there's a bit of "in your face" we all would like to say to all the gun haters. But, once again, who are we annoying in the process. The more abvious we are with our OC the more we are noticed. Outa site outa mind is sometimes a better deal. I don't want to get the soccer moms trying to protect there childern from a perfectly legal OCer just because she thinks you're a threat. We could send all the folks that are riding the fence on gun control to the side of total restriction. [/QUOTE]

Verification