Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
ATF Final Rule Redefines Word ‘Sale’ So that ‘Bartering’ for a Neighbor’s Gun Requires a NICS Check
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="undeg01" data-source="post: 4254979" data-attributes="member: 26476"><p>I have been pondering whether going through a FFL matters in the ATF’s eyes on this new interpretation of the law. I have seen nothing that relieves a seller IF they simply go through a FFL. It seems that if ATF determines your are “in the business,” you are in violation if you yourself are not a FFL holder. Am I missing something?</p><p></p><p>I have also wondered how this will affect estate sales of firearms collections. Will ATF determine that upon death, your collection exceeds their arbitrary limit on # of sales so will they seize the collection under that premise? Will your heirs be subject to prosecution for their inheritance and sale or distribution of firearms?</p><p></p><p>Waaayyy too many open ends on this deal that open the door for the ATF to broaden their scope and reach.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="undeg01, post: 4254979, member: 26476"] I have been pondering whether going through a FFL matters in the ATF’s eyes on this new interpretation of the law. I have seen nothing that relieves a seller IF they simply go through a FFL. It seems that if ATF determines your are “in the business,” you are in violation if you yourself are not a FFL holder. Am I missing something? I have also wondered how this will affect estate sales of firearms collections. Will ATF determine that upon death, your collection exceeds their arbitrary limit on # of sales so will they seize the collection under that premise? Will your heirs be subject to prosecution for their inheritance and sale or distribution of firearms? Waaayyy too many open ends on this deal that open the door for the ATF to broaden their scope and reach. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
ATF Final Rule Redefines Word ‘Sale’ So that ‘Bartering’ for a Neighbor’s Gun Requires a NICS Check
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
