Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
ATF Little Rock.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 4237657" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>He “wasn’t the poster child we want or need” so it’s OK they killed him? </p><p></p><p>Even if you find pre-dawn raids for process crimes acceptable, your idea that they weren’t interested in detaining him “yet” is just silly. They ran a LONG investigation on him for reselling Glocks and decided it was time to seize evidence from his home with a warrant. But they didn’t want to detain him yet? So instead, they set up a pre-dawn raid that maximized the chances of him defending his home from invaders, which resulted in the firefight where they killed him. Oh, and you don’t think they intended to “detain” him and perp-walk him to the car in his underwear like they do so many others? LOL</p><p></p><p>How in the butternut squash does that make any sense to you?</p><p></p><p>If all you want to do is seize evidence that obviously can’t be flushed in the time between the knock and entry, you do it in the daylight when the residence is either unoccupied or the primary suspect is not there. Even the ATF is known to do this, just ask Johnny Lawmaster in Tulsa, OK!</p><p></p><p>You do what they did so you can justify your tactical gear and training, and you do it to send a message. It’s literally indefensible to anyone who finds feds killing citizens in their own homes to be bad news. <img src="/images/smilies/rolleyes2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes2" title="Rolleyes2 :rolleyes2" data-shortname=":rolleyes2" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 4237657, member: 1132"] He “wasn’t the poster child we want or need” so it’s OK they killed him? Even if you find pre-dawn raids for process crimes acceptable, your idea that they weren’t interested in detaining him “yet” is just silly. They ran a LONG investigation on him for reselling Glocks and decided it was time to seize evidence from his home with a warrant. But they didn’t want to detain him yet? So instead, they set up a pre-dawn raid that maximized the chances of him defending his home from invaders, which resulted in the firefight where they killed him. Oh, and you don’t think they intended to “detain” him and perp-walk him to the car in his underwear like they do so many others? LOL How in the butternut squash does that make any sense to you? If all you want to do is seize evidence that obviously can’t be flushed in the time between the knock and entry, you do it in the daylight when the residence is either unoccupied or the primary suspect is not there. Even the ATF is known to do this, just ask Johnny Lawmaster in Tulsa, OK! You do what they did so you can justify your tactical gear and training, and you do it to send a message. It’s literally indefensible to anyone who finds feds killing citizens in their own homes to be bad news. :rolleyes2 [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
ATF Little Rock.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
