Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BobbyV" data-source="post: 4237708" data-attributes="member: 32629">It just seems odd that chose to serve the guy at home where he&#039;d have very easy access to any number of firearms.&nbsp; That&#039;s what seems to be the very questionable part to me.&nbsp; I&#039;d expect any group that served a warrant before daylight to understand they&#039;re likely going to face some resistance with a no-knock warrant, but yes, we don&#039;t know if that&#039;s the type of warrant served or not.&nbsp; So I can understand how we might not know that detail for a bit.They knew his schedule . . . I&#039;d hope they also weighed the risks of whatever type they served.Unless this guy has some violent history we&#039;re not aware of, I wonder if the ATF is looking for a bigger fish as part of this investigation.&nbsp; Otherwise, you&#039;d think they&#039;d specifically state how it went down as quickly as possible.You knew that was going to be part of this from day 1.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BobbyV, post: 4237708, member: 32629"] It just seems odd that chose to serve the guy at home where he'd have very easy access to any number of firearms. That's what seems to be the very questionable part to me. I'd expect any group that served a warrant before daylight to understand they're likely going to face some resistance with a no-knock warrant, but yes, we don't know if that's the type of warrant served or not. So I can understand how we might not know that detail for a bit. They knew his schedule . . . I'd hope they also weighed the risks of whatever type they served. Unless this guy has some violent history we're not aware of, I wonder if the ATF is looking for a bigger fish as part of this investigation. Otherwise, you'd think they'd specifically state how it went down as quickly as possible. You knew that was going to be part of this from day 1. [/QUOTE]

Verification