Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
ATF Little Rock.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jakeman" data-source="post: 4238063" data-attributes="member: 10690"><p>The entire agency is just boiling over with class. From the top to the bottom. </p><p></p><p>2 suits could have served the search warrant to him at work, and then requested entry and then forced entry if voluntary entry wasn't granted. A cell phone call to the agents standing by at the house would have sufficed. The subject of search warrants don't have to be present for them to be executed. Not all search warrants require tactical entry pre-dawn. But, if they did it that way there was going to be a very slim chance they would be able to kill him with impunity, so to hell with that. When given an opportunity to do things with or without violence and a golden opportunity to execute a United States citizen the ATF chooses violence way too often. Look no further than Waco. </p><p></p><p>Whether or not this guy was guilty of anything or not isn't the point, but he sure as hell didn't receive due process. Is the new standard for some here; if you're suspected of committing a "in the business" crime you deserve to be executed by federal agents without benefit of a trial? I can't think of more than about 5 amendments to the US Constitution that prohibit the government from such egregious behavior.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jakeman, post: 4238063, member: 10690"] The entire agency is just boiling over with class. From the top to the bottom. 2 suits could have served the search warrant to him at work, and then requested entry and then forced entry if voluntary entry wasn't granted. A cell phone call to the agents standing by at the house would have sufficed. The subject of search warrants don't have to be present for them to be executed. Not all search warrants require tactical entry pre-dawn. But, if they did it that way there was going to be a very slim chance they would be able to kill him with impunity, so to hell with that. When given an opportunity to do things with or without violence and a golden opportunity to execute a United States citizen the ATF chooses violence way too often. Look no further than Waco. Whether or not this guy was guilty of anything or not isn't the point, but he sure as hell didn't receive due process. Is the new standard for some here; if you're suspected of committing a "in the business" crime you deserve to be executed by federal agents without benefit of a trial? I can't think of more than about 5 amendments to the US Constitution that prohibit the government from such egregious behavior. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
ATF Little Rock.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom