Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Ballistic energy restrictions, the new gun control avenue
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JoeUSooner" data-source="post: 4114463" data-attributes="member: 55109"><p>Point of clarity...</p><p></p><p>"Assault <em><strong>rifles</strong>"</em> are real, and ownership by civilians is already banned - well, they're partially restricted, anyway - by law. They are fully-automatic, military-only (with two exceptions), and have a very specific definition that the military carefully documents. But "assault <em><strong>weapons</strong></em>," on the other hand, do not exist. That's a nebulous (completely without definition) and fictitious term. Several years ago, a Democrat anti-gun politician pulled it out of thin air - or his anal orifice - for the sole public-relations purpose of scaring people with little/no actual knowledge of firearms.</p><p></p><p>Responsible members of the firearms community should be very careful with those two terms, and never use them interchangeably.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JoeUSooner, post: 4114463, member: 55109"] Point of clarity... "Assault [I][B]rifles[/B]"[/I] are real, and ownership by civilians is already banned - well, they're partially restricted, anyway - by law. They are fully-automatic, military-only (with two exceptions), and have a very specific definition that the military carefully documents. But "assault [I][B]weapons[/B][/I]," on the other hand, do not exist. That's a nebulous (completely without definition) and fictitious term. Several years ago, a Democrat anti-gun politician pulled it out of thin air - or his anal orifice - for the sole public-relations purpose of scaring people with little/no actual knowledge of firearms. Responsible members of the firearms community should be very careful with those two terms, and never use them interchangeably. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Ballistic energy restrictions, the new gun control avenue
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom