Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Shadowrider" data-source="post: 1966966" data-attributes="member: 3099">I&#039;m not saying that it is so, but it sure appears that Obama might have his own little Iran-Contra going on.&nbsp; If Benghazi was that damn dangerous why in the hell was our Ambassador there?&nbsp; Seems to be common knowledge that he was quite well connected with the rebels, so I hypothesize that SOMETHING was afoot.&nbsp; What that is is anyone&#039;s guess.&nbsp; Even the Red Cross had beat feet out of there.&nbsp; Why was he there?&nbsp; But this whole deal, just like Fast &amp; Furious fails the &quot;smell test&quot; miserably.&nbsp; You could almost read Hillary&#039;s mind by her demeanor when she was blaming the video.&nbsp; She looked extremely disgusted that she had got herself involved in such a lame excuse of a coverup and seemed embarrassed to be associated with the dimwit amateur calling the shots.&nbsp; It was like she knew that she was going to end up being the scapegoat and was in shock at the whole deal.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Shadowrider, post: 1966966, member: 3099"] I'm not saying that it is so, but it sure appears that Obama might have his own little Iran-Contra going on. If Benghazi was that damn dangerous why in the hell was our Ambassador there? Seems to be common knowledge that he was quite well connected with the rebels, so I hypothesize that [I]SOMETHING[/I] was afoot. What that is is anyone's guess. Even the Red Cross had beat feet out of there. Why was he there? But this whole deal, just like Fast & Furious fails the "smell test" miserably. You could almost read Hillary's mind by her demeanor when she was blaming the video. She looked extremely disgusted that she had got herself involved in such a lame excuse of a coverup and seemed embarrassed to be associated with the dimwit amateur calling the shots. It was like she knew that she was going to end up being the scapegoat and was in shock at the whole deal. [/QUOTE]

Verification