Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
***** DOJ interfering in Arizona election audit
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 3572510" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>Ehh ... Umm ... Does this not remind anyone of the "ballot interpretations" the Democrats engaged in when **** lost in Florida? Hanging chads and all that falderal? I guess it's OK for them to interpret, though. And, those rules <strong><em><u>seemed</u></em></strong> haphazard, lacked specifics ,and left much room for interpretation, not that those rules <strong><em><u>were</u></em></strong> haphazard, lacked specifics ,and left much room for interpretation. Without proof, they are simply casting dispersions, falshoods, and baseless doubt. Obviously, they have something to hide. Obviously, they are preparing grounds to nullify any findings that expose them for what they are and what they have done.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 3572510, member: 745"] Ehh ... Umm ... Does this not remind anyone of the "ballot interpretations" the Democrats engaged in when **** lost in Florida? Hanging chads and all that falderal? I guess it's OK for them to interpret, though. And, those rules [B][I][U]seemed[/U][/I][/B] haphazard, lacked specifics ,and left much room for interpretation, not that those rules [B][I][U]were[/U][/I][/B] haphazard, lacked specifics ,and left much room for interpretation. Without proof, they are simply casting dispersions, falshoods, and baseless doubt. Obviously, they have something to hide. Obviously, they are preparing grounds to nullify any findings that expose them for what they are and what they have done. Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
***** DOJ interfering in Arizona election audit
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
