Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Rez Exelon" data-source="post: 4204942" data-attributes="member: 5800">SCOTUS said corporations are people. They're like super people actually. They CEO should probably get to vote on behalf of all his employees even. Based on CEO pay they are obviously smarter, better, and harder working than everyone else, so why should they have a vote worth 100,000:1 since their Giant Corp. is considered a "people".Funny thing --- When Democrats and other gun-control folks talk about that people "should have to jump through a hoop or two" this community gets all up in arms about it. But when it comes to voting, it seems like lots more people are happy to infringe.Can you point out, from a valid news source, what percentage of election results have been flipped or compromised by election cheating? To be clear, I will absolutely say that there are irregularities. There's even cases where people have committed fraud. But I have not personally seen anything substantively pointing out that these irregularities actually resulted in a changed outcome of a given race.As it's been stated in the thread, there's just no reason that Oklahoma, one of the reddest states in the Union, can justify this based on a history or pattern of election problems compared to the imposition on the people that it would cause. In my opinion, it would be like how the MTA in NYC appears to have paid 150million in money to police to catch subway fare skippers that cost the MTA 105 thousand. Which, if my math is right, and the numbers are accurate, that is a net loss of $149,895,000.00 in money.</blockquote>

Verification