Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Body Scanners More Dangerous Than Feds Admit
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="4play" data-source="post: 1377697" data-attributes="member: 7223"><p>And talking about radiation etc... No more intelligent than I am (haha), one of my main concerns was for the people that travel frequently by air. Lets say they might have to enter a body scanner multiple times per week, maybe even once per day at times. Are these types of scenarios counted into the "damage" that might be involved at these higher frequencies?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="4play, post: 1377697, member: 7223"] And talking about radiation etc... No more intelligent than I am (haha), one of my main concerns was for the people that travel frequently by air. Lets say they might have to enter a body scanner multiple times per week, maybe even once per day at times. Are these types of scenarios counted into the "damage" that might be involved at these higher frequencies? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Body Scanners More Dangerous Than Feds Admit
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
