Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
Breaking: ATF Changes Their Mind On Pistol Braces AGAIN
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jakeman" data-source="post: 4043633" data-attributes="member: 10690"><p>I wouldn’t think join date would matter. If an organization receives injunctive relief, I believe it applies to all members, regardless of when they became a member, but I slept in my own bed last night, not at a Holiday Inn. I also am not a lawyer, nor do I portray one on TV. So, I could be very, very wrong. </p><p></p><p>Someone with the money needs to keep chasing this thing all the way up until we get a 6-3 ruling on SBR’s, SBS’s and suppressors. Capricious rules are capricious. They gots tago. </p><p></p><p>All three of those things should be able to be purchased at a local Atwood’s with nothing more than a standard 4473. If they insist on knowing everyone that has one, which is unconstitutional on its face, issue a card (like a CCW) to those that request one and pass a normal 4473 background check. Once you have the card, buy as many or as few suppressors as you like and the same with the other 2, following a proceed on a 4473 for the firearms. Passing a background check on an accessory is as dumb as it gets. Imagine having to wait 9-15 months to buy a rifle scope. Stupid. Put into place by people that have probably never fired a firearm in their lives. Dumbest **** ever.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jakeman, post: 4043633, member: 10690"] I wouldn’t think join date would matter. If an organization receives injunctive relief, I believe it applies to all members, regardless of when they became a member, but I slept in my own bed last night, not at a Holiday Inn. I also am not a lawyer, nor do I portray one on TV. So, I could be very, very wrong. Someone with the money needs to keep chasing this thing all the way up until we get a 6-3 ruling on SBR’s, SBS’s and suppressors. Capricious rules are capricious. They gots tago. All three of those things should be able to be purchased at a local Atwood’s with nothing more than a standard 4473. If they insist on knowing everyone that has one, which is unconstitutional on its face, issue a card (like a CCW) to those that request one and pass a normal 4473 background check. Once you have the card, buy as many or as few suppressors as you like and the same with the other 2, following a proceed on a 4473 for the firearms. Passing a background check on an accessory is as dumb as it gets. Imagine having to wait 9-15 months to buy a rifle scope. Stupid. Put into place by people that have probably never fired a firearm in their lives. Dumbest **** ever. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
Breaking: ATF Changes Their Mind On Pistol Braces AGAIN
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom