1. Welcome to Oklahoma Shooters Association! Join today, registration is easy!

    You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.
  2. All members receive 3 free listings a month. Get unlimited listings for just $10 a year! Click here for all the info.

Bump stock law

Discussion in 'Law & Order' started by chadh2o, Mar 10, 2021.

  1. chadh2o

    chadh2o Gunslinger

    Supporter
    Messages:
    495
    Likes Received:
    471
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2015
    Location:
    Norman
    Rating
    100%
    Administrative state gone too far.

    NCLA Appeals Bump Stock Ban Ruling that Allowed ATF to Get Away with Rewriting Criminal Law
    Mar 8, 2021 | Press Releases
    https://nclalegal.org/2021/03/ncla-...-atf-to-get-away-with-rewriting-criminal-law/
    Washington, DC (March 8, 2021) — Congress has not prohibited bump stocks, and it is thus unlawful for a prosecutorial entity like the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to rewrite the law in Congress’ place. That’s the basic argument the New Civil Liberties Alliance, a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group, makes in its opening brief filed today in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Cargill v. Wilkinson, et al.

    The case of NCLA’s client, Michael Cargill of Austin, TX, was the first challenge to ATF’s bump stock ban to go to trial, last September. Instead of shutting down an administrative shortcut and restoring constitutional lawmaking principles, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas turned a blind eye to numerous legal discrepancies caused by ATF’s unauthorized revision of a federal statute.

    ATF does not have the power to issue binding legislative rules like the Final Rule targeting bump stocks. Yet, in December 2019, under direction from the Attorney General and U.S. Department of Justice, ATF’s Final Rule altered the statutory definition of a “machinegun” to include bump stocks. It turned an estimated 520,000 bump stock owners into felons overnight and ordered law-abiding Americans to destroy or surrender their devices to ATF or face 10 years in prison. Even though the Rule’s promulgation involved determining the scope of criminal liability, which is solely Congress’ responsibility, the district court concluded that bump stocks have always been prohibited by the statute—echoing ATF’s distorted claim that its rule is “interpretive” not “legislative” in nature.

    ... more at link above.
     
  2. Fredkrueger100

    Fredkrueger100 Come to Freddy!!

    Supporter
    Messages:
    6,118
    Likes Received:
    3,187
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2012
    Location:
    Shawnee, OK
    Rating
    100%
    The GOA have sued the ATF over this. It hasn’t turned out very well so far but is still going through the process. Even if the scotus takes it up they won’t do the right thing.
     
  3. BobbyV

    BobbyV Uh huh . . . sure

    Supporter
    Messages:
    2,701
    Likes Received:
    2,745
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2013
    Location:
    Logan County
    Rating
    100%
    STS11, saltydog, OKCHunter and 3 others like this.

Share This Page