Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Car quality going down the tubes?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Profreedomokie" data-source="post: 3852339" data-attributes="member: 524"><p>Mostly because it was. I'm restoring a 1962 Jaguar Mk II. It has grease zerks on the door hinges. The aluminum hemi head double overhead cam straight six cylinder motor was used by Jaguar for 45 years. The body metal is about twice as thick as todays cars. The motor puts out 220 hp from the 3.8 liter motor ,which is close to 1hp per cu.in.. Muscle car performance without computers and variable valve timing. The headlights are glass and don't glaze up. Designed to be worked on with access covers that can be removed to get to certain bolts. The most complicated item on the whole car is the double overhead cams. Drawbacks are the sorry Lucas electronics (Lucas Lord of Darkness), 19 mpg, and being worth more than I want to risk driving amongst todays distracted drivers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Profreedomokie, post: 3852339, member: 524"] Mostly because it was. I'm restoring a 1962 Jaguar Mk II. It has grease zerks on the door hinges. The aluminum hemi head double overhead cam straight six cylinder motor was used by Jaguar for 45 years. The body metal is about twice as thick as todays cars. The motor puts out 220 hp from the 3.8 liter motor ,which is close to 1hp per cu.in.. Muscle car performance without computers and variable valve timing. The headlights are glass and don't glaze up. Designed to be worked on with access covers that can be removed to get to certain bolts. The most complicated item on the whole car is the double overhead cams. Drawbacks are the sorry Lucas electronics (Lucas Lord of Darkness), 19 mpg, and being worth more than I want to risk driving amongst todays distracted drivers. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Car quality going down the tubes?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom